250 lines
No EOL
6.8 KiB
Markdown
250 lines
No EOL
6.8 KiB
Markdown
# RSpec Test Suite Analysis
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
The hensei-api project has a partial test suite with significant coverage gaps. While the existing tests demonstrate good practices and patterns, only about 35% of models and 33% of controllers have test coverage. The test suite contains 36 spec files with approximately 3,713 lines of test code.
|
|
|
|
## Test Coverage Overview
|
|
|
|
### Current State
|
|
|
|
- **Total Spec Files**: 36
|
|
- **Total Test Lines**: ~3,713 lines
|
|
- **SimpleCov**: Configured but basic setup only
|
|
- **CI/CD**: No CI configuration detected (.github, .gitlab-ci, .circleci)
|
|
|
|
### Coverage by Component
|
|
|
|
#### Models (8/23 = 35% coverage)
|
|
**Tested Models:**
|
|
- `gacha_spec.rb`
|
|
- `grid_characters_spec.rb`
|
|
- `grid_summons_spec.rb`
|
|
- `grid_weapon_spec.rb`
|
|
- `party_spec.rb`
|
|
- `user_spec.rb` (contains only pending example)
|
|
- `weapon_key_spec.rb`
|
|
- `weapon_spec.rb`
|
|
|
|
**Missing Tests (15 models):**
|
|
- `app_update`
|
|
- `application_record`
|
|
- `awakening`
|
|
- `character`
|
|
- `data_version`
|
|
- `favorite`
|
|
- `grid_character` (note: grid_characters_spec exists)
|
|
- `grid_summon` (note: grid_summons_spec exists)
|
|
- `guidebook`
|
|
- `job`
|
|
- `job_accessory`
|
|
- `job_skill`
|
|
- `raid`
|
|
- `raid_group`
|
|
- `summon`
|
|
- `weapon_awakening`
|
|
|
|
#### Controllers/Requests (8/24 = 33% coverage)
|
|
**Tested Endpoints:**
|
|
- `drag_drop_api_spec.rb`
|
|
- `drag_drop_endpoints_spec.rb`
|
|
- `grid_characters_controller_spec.rb`
|
|
- `grid_summons_controller_spec.rb`
|
|
- `grid_weapons_controller_spec.rb`
|
|
- `import_controller_spec.rb`
|
|
- `job_skills_spec.rb`
|
|
- `parties_controller_spec.rb`
|
|
|
|
**Controller Concerns:**
|
|
- `party_authorization_concern_spec.rb`
|
|
- `party_querying_concern_spec.rb`
|
|
|
|
#### Services (5 tested)
|
|
- `party_query_builder_spec.rb`
|
|
- `processors/base_processor_spec.rb`
|
|
- `processors/character_processor_spec.rb`
|
|
- `processors/job_processor_spec.rb`
|
|
- `processors/summon_processor_spec.rb`
|
|
- `processors/weapon_processor_spec.rb`
|
|
|
|
## Test Quality Assessment
|
|
|
|
### Strengths
|
|
|
|
1. **Well-Structured Tests**
|
|
- Clear describe/context/it blocks
|
|
- Good use of RSpec conventions
|
|
- Descriptive test names
|
|
|
|
2. **Comprehensive Validation Testing**
|
|
```ruby
|
|
# Example from party_spec.rb
|
|
context 'for element' do
|
|
it 'is valid when element is nil'
|
|
it 'is valid when element is one of the allowed values'
|
|
it 'is invalid when element is not one of the allowed values'
|
|
it 'is invalid when element is not an integer'
|
|
end
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
3. **Good Factory Usage**
|
|
- FactoryBot configured with appropriate defaults
|
|
- Uses Faker for realistic test data
|
|
- Sequences for unique values
|
|
|
|
4. **Authorization Testing**
|
|
- Tests for both authenticated and anonymous users
|
|
- Edit key validation for anonymous parties
|
|
- Owner vs non-owner permission checks
|
|
|
|
5. **Request Specs Follow Best Practices**
|
|
- Full request cycle testing
|
|
- JSON response parsing
|
|
- HTTP status code verification
|
|
- Database change expectations
|
|
|
|
### Weaknesses
|
|
|
|
1. **Low Coverage**
|
|
- 65% of models untested
|
|
- 67% of controllers untested
|
|
- Critical models like `Character`, `Summon`, `Job` lack tests
|
|
|
|
2. **Incomplete Test Files**
|
|
- `user_spec.rb` contains only: `pending "add some examples"`
|
|
- No actual tests for User model despite it being central to authentication
|
|
|
|
3. **Missing Integration Tests**
|
|
- No end-to-end workflow tests
|
|
- No tests for complex multi-model interactions
|
|
- Missing tests for background jobs
|
|
|
|
4. **No Performance Tests**
|
|
- No tests for query optimization
|
|
- No load testing for endpoints
|
|
- No N+1 query detection
|
|
|
|
5. **Limited Error Scenario Testing**
|
|
- Few tests for error handling
|
|
- Missing edge case coverage
|
|
- Limited testing of failure scenarios
|
|
|
|
## Test Patterns and Conventions
|
|
|
|
### Model Tests Pattern
|
|
```ruby
|
|
RSpec.describe Model, type: :model do
|
|
# Association tests
|
|
it { is_expected.to belong_to(:related_model) }
|
|
|
|
# Validation tests
|
|
describe 'validations' do
|
|
it { should validate_presence_of(:field) }
|
|
it { should validate_numericality_of(:number_field) }
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
# Custom method tests
|
|
describe '#custom_method' do
|
|
# Test implementation
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Request Tests Pattern
|
|
```ruby
|
|
RSpec.describe 'API Endpoint', type: :request do
|
|
let(:user) { create(:user) }
|
|
let(:access_token) { create_doorkeeper_token(user) }
|
|
let(:headers) { auth_headers(access_token) }
|
|
|
|
describe 'POST /endpoint' do
|
|
it 'creates resource' do
|
|
expect { post '/api/v1/endpoint', params: params, headers: headers }
|
|
.to change(Model, :count).by(1)
|
|
expect(response).to have_http_status(:created)
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Critical Gaps
|
|
|
|
### High Priority Missing Tests
|
|
|
|
1. **Authentication & Authorization**
|
|
- User model specs incomplete
|
|
- No tests for OAuth/Doorkeeper integration
|
|
- Missing role-based access control tests
|
|
|
|
2. **Core Domain Models**
|
|
- Character model (central to parties)
|
|
- Summon model (key grid component)
|
|
- Weapon/Awakening models
|
|
- Job and JobSkill models
|
|
|
|
3. **Data Import/Export**
|
|
- Limited import controller testing
|
|
- No export functionality tests
|
|
- Missing validation for imported data
|
|
|
|
4. **Collection Features**
|
|
- No tests for planned collection tracking
|
|
- Missing artifact system tests
|
|
- No crew feature tests
|
|
|
|
## Recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Immediate Actions
|
|
|
|
1. **Complete User Model Tests**
|
|
- Replace pending example with actual tests
|
|
- Test authentication methods
|
|
- Test associations and validations
|
|
|
|
2. **Add Core Model Tests**
|
|
- Priority: Character, Summon, Job models
|
|
- Focus on validations and associations
|
|
- Test business logic methods
|
|
|
|
3. **Implement CI/CD**
|
|
- Set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI
|
|
- Run tests on every PR
|
|
- Add coverage reporting
|
|
|
|
### Short-term Improvements
|
|
|
|
1. **Increase Coverage Target**
|
|
- Aim for 80% model coverage
|
|
- Aim for 70% controller coverage
|
|
- Use SimpleCov to track progress
|
|
|
|
2. **Add Integration Tests**
|
|
- Test complete user workflows
|
|
- Test party creation with all components
|
|
- Test import/export flows
|
|
|
|
3. **Implement Test Helpers**
|
|
- Create shared examples for common patterns
|
|
- Add custom matchers for domain logic
|
|
- Build test data builders for complex scenarios
|
|
|
|
### Long-term Goals
|
|
|
|
1. **Comprehensive Test Suite**
|
|
- Achieve 90%+ code coverage
|
|
- Add performance test suite
|
|
- Implement mutation testing
|
|
|
|
2. **Test Documentation**
|
|
- Document testing conventions
|
|
- Create testing guidelines
|
|
- Maintain test writing standards
|
|
|
|
3. **Automated Quality Checks**
|
|
- Pre-commit hooks for tests
|
|
- Automated coverage reporting
|
|
- Test quality metrics tracking
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
The current test suite provides a solid foundation with good patterns and practices, but significant gaps exist in coverage. The testing infrastructure (FactoryBot, RSpec configuration) is well-set up, making it straightforward to add missing tests. Priority should be given to testing core domain models and implementing CI/CD to ensure test execution on every code change. |